I was very interested in Tim Bass' response to my posting Regulation: Don’t Throw the Baby Out With the Bathwater. You can read Tim's post here but in summary he feels that "the US economy (read individual investors) would be much better off if financial services firms (or anyone) were not permitted to use computers next to stock exchanges to seek split second “get rich quick” opportunities that the normal, traditional investor does not have. The only “economy” that benefits are entities that participate in this type of activity and the technology firms selling the hardware and software to make “all the madness” possible."
My response to Tim is as follows: I respect your views as always and understand where you're coming from. My view on this is that HFT is not driving the market big picture -- fundamentals will still do that. So people still invest in companies driven by good economics. HFT makes the market more efficient. And yes it does accentuate movements.
The point I was trying to make is that you can protect investors from some of the rapid movements that HFT can accentuate by having electronic safeguards -- like real-time pre-trade risk and real-time market surveillance.
Sure I want to sell people more software - but there's a bit more to it. If I didn't work for Progress I'd still feel the same way as I do.
On the other hand Colin Clark, who had a lot of experience in real-time surveillance with his company Kaskad, posts that he doesn't blame CEP and HFT for the Flash Crash. Instead he cites issues with NYSE and market fundamentals. See his post here.
This topic definitely incites strong opinions. A lot of bankers I know often don't feel safe even admitting they are bankers in public in case they get lynched for causing such suffering in the economy!!
What do you think caused the Flash Crash? We set up a little vote which you can get to here
There are others that support the view of better continual oversight of the markets too. Here's Hirander Misra, founder of Algo Technologies and Chi-X, speaking to the Financial Times. http://tinyurl.com/22veh6w
Posted by: Giles Nelson | Wednesday, May 26, 2010 at 08:01 AM
I'm working to operate my very own website yet I believe its as well standard and I would like to concentrate much more on smaller tips. Becoming all items to all most people is not really all that its crumbled as much as be.
Posted by: Shox NZ | Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 01:26 AM
I appreciate your honest post here on . As hard as it is to believe, it is possible you overlooked the few things in question. It would appear it has become a little out of hand with a so much of information to manage about . As a experienced person of nearly 15 years, i must say i totally agree with you on .
Posted by: Francis | Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 02:33 AM
It is a pingback from a further webpage.!!!. as this really is starting to be even more widespread (that is a very good point!) I'll very likely appearance to fixing the exhibit of it. good
Posted by: Pumas shoes | Tuesday, November 09, 2010 at 08:10 AM
It created me assume how 3-dimensional I wished our file to be without having imitating them of program, and exhibit the place we ended up at creatively". The file deeper features a "Political Element" consisting notable speeches by American political figures.
Posted by: white iphone 4 | Wednesday, December 01, 2010 at 04:29 AM
I really like this website , and hope you will write more ,thanks a lot for your information.
http://www.nfljerseysmalls.com
Posted by: hats for sale | Saturday, July 16, 2011 at 05:36 AM